Thats a very good question. Is less about tenses and more about expressing a somewhat negative surprise or amazement, sometimes enhanced by adding ever: · why no, no more then reason. Hot network questions malicious curl request to remote server by a hidden script found in my user folder, am i safe with just removing the script? They will fail in their attempt to conquer england. It was preserved in dialects in the us south, but was originally from english dialects on the other side of the atlantic. It is in fact part of a conditional sentence in which the if clause is omitted but implied. I would say that whoever introduced the ananas to the public first used the term pineapple and that is how the word became the accepted name for the fruit. First it was just a question expressing doubt reduced to its essence: I can only speculate. But in 52 years, ive used cunt anatomically only a handful of times, and i cant recall ever using it as a slang reference for a woman. If you were in your right mind,. This beside the point that why do you have to get going? is more direct. Ive used all of the other ones on occasion. I dont know why , but it seems to me bob would sound a bit strange if he said, why is it that you have to get going? eliminating that before bob would seem to be more in context with the criticism of the way bob sounds. The implied part could be for example: Quirk & greenbaum: · why was the sanskrit word laksha anglicized to lakh? Whelm is labeled as archaic in noad, as it has fallen out of use. · why would you do that? — why is that so? Left in its wake are the would-be superlative overwhelm (which, rather than actually meaning more than whelmed, has simply taken over its parents definition) and its opposite underwhelm. A university grammar of english chapter 13, section 7 notes that 3 of those nasty wh pronouns can function as relative pros. It is best that we negotiate a truce with spain. · i dont think we are discussing whether ananas or pineapple was used first, but where it came from and why the english language does not use ananas today. It certainly is offensive here in the us, and im not sure why its considered so much worse than other anglo-saxon words. · as a non native english speaker, i am astonished at the amount of english word pronounced different from their spelling. For instance, would is pronounced like wood, whole is pronounced like. Why would you ever do that? · whats worse for those old fossilized grammar school pedants is that why can even be considered a relative pronoun, (perish the thought!). I believe the spanish armies cannot threaten us. The oed doesnt explain why it is used in that manner.
Why Cucurella Is Furious Over Maduekes Move To Arsenal – You Wont Believe This!
Thats a very good question. Is less about tenses and more about expressing a somewhat negative surprise or amazement, sometimes enhanced by adding ever: ·...
